Get Permission Rana, Fernandes, Maheshwari, and Gupta: KCOT /OKC clinical-molecular pathogenesis, surgical treatment & prognosis: A review


Introduction

Keratocystic odontogenic tumor (KOT), previously known as odontogenic keratocyst, is a cystic benign neoplasm that originates from the odontogenic epithelial remnant first described by Philipsen (1956). 1 It is mostly seen in the second, third and fourth decades of life with male predilection. 2 Its local invasive behavior, high recurrence rate, and association with a genetic mutation that may or may not be associated with the nevoid basal cell carcinoma syndrome (NBCCS) have attracted the attention of researchers worldwide.3 World Health Organization described OKC as a locally aggressive, cystic jaw lesion with a putative high growth potential and a propensity for recurrence.4 Odontogenic keratocyst is a developmental odontogenic cyst typically occurring in the mandible and maxilla, with a predilection for angle and ascending ramus of the mandible.5 The OKC involves approximately 11% of all cysts in the jaws and can be associated, although not in all cases, with an impacted third molar. 6 Radiographically, OKCs present as a well defined radiolucent lesions with smooth and usually corticated margins. 7 They may present as either a multilocular or unilocular radiolucent lesion. In 25% to 40% of cases, there is an unerupted tooth involved in the lesion. It may give the appeatance of a periapical cyst, dentigerous cyst, lateral periodontal cyst, nasopalatine duct cyst, traumatic duct cyst and even tumors such as ameloblastoma.8 KCOT arises from cell rests of the dental lamina, typically showing a thin, friable wall, which is often difficult to enucleate from the bone in one piece, and have small satellite cysts within the fibrous wall. 9 It tends to grow in the anteroposterior direction within the medullary cavity of the bone without causing obvious bone expansion thus causing its delayed observation by the patients. 10 Most of the researchers have found increased immunohistochemical expression of the proliferation markers Ki67 and PCNA in the OKC compared to other odontogenic lesions.11 Non-neoplastic proliferative lesions may also demonstrate high expression of some proliferative markers. 12 The Ki-67 expression is also seen in low grade mucoepidermoid carcinoma, a malignant neoplasm, which is significantly lower than that in glandular odontogenic cysts, an odontogenic cyst. 13 Recent advances in genetic and molecular research, i.e., PTCH1 mutations and involvement of the Hedgehog signaling pathway, have led to increased knowledge of OKC pathogenesis which hints at potential new treatment options. 14 Treatment of KCOT are generally classified as conservative or aggressive. Conservative treatment usually includes simple enucleation, with or without curettage, or marsupialization. Aggressive treatment generally includes peripheral ostectomy, chemical curettage with Carnoy’s solution, cryotherapy, or electrocautery and resection. 15

Clinical-molecular pathogenesis

The OKC grows primarily in the marrow spaces and in an antero-posterior direction. Only when they reach a considerable size they expand bucco-lingually and become evident clinically when seen by the clinician most of them are large and may have perforated the bone especially lingually where the capsule is in close contact with the periosteum. A considerable number of OKCs are asymptomatic and hence are detected only by incidental radiographic findings. When they are symptomatic, swelling and intra-oral drainage appear to be most common.16 Lesions found in children are often indicative of multiple cysts as a component of NBCCS. Approximately 5% of patients with OKCs/KCOTs have multiple cysts and another 5% have NBCCS.

OKCs /KCOTs are found in the mandible in approximately a 2 : 1 ratio. In the mandible, the posterior portion of the body and the ramus region are most commonly affected, and in the maxilla, the third molar area is mostly affected.

Radiographically, an OKC/KCOT characteristically presents as a well-circumscribed radiolucency with smooth radiopaque margins. Multilocularity is often present and tends to be seen mostlty in larger lesions. Most lesions, however, are unilocular, with as many as 40% noted adjacent to the crown of an unerupted tooth (dentigerous cyst presentation). Approximately 30% of maxillary and 50% of mandibular lesions produce buccal expansion. Mandibular lingual enlargement is occasionally seen.17

The World Health Organization (WHO) has recommended the use of the term keratocystic odontogenic tumor (KCOT), rather than odontogenic keratocyst (OKC), because the former name better reflects the neoplastic behavior of the lesion. Genetically, the lesion shows a repeatable chromosomal abnormality (PTCH gene on chromosome 9q22.3-q31). Nevoid basal cell carcinoma syndrome is a rare inherited multisystem disorder that is a result of mutations in the PTCH gene.18 Classical triad composed of the syndrome is multiple basal cell carcinoma, OKC, Bifid ribs.Other variety of possible abnormalities are, cutaneous anomalies, dental and osseous anomalies, ophthalmologic abnormalities, neurologic anomalies sexual abnormalities etc. 19

The epithelial lining of OKC expresses higher levels of p53 than any other cyst types. This overexpression is not only due to mutation of p53 gene, rather reflects overproduction or stabilization of normal p53 protein. Other genes that can be correlated to OKC/KOT are PTCH2 and SUFU. Few authors also have demonstrated loss of heterozygosity in p16, MCC, TSLC1, LTAS2, and FHIT genes.4 These findings thus explain the aggressive behaviour of OKC. The defining histologic feature—the presence of parakeratin—is unique among the myriad inflammatory and developmental cysts that occur in the jaws. 19 Typically corrugated, rippled or wrinkled epithelium. Uniform thickness of epithelium, usually ranging from 6 to10 cells layer Prominent, polarized basal layer of cells give picket fence or tombstone appearance. Lumen of the cyst may be filled with a thin straw coloured fluid or might be thicker creamy material. In presence of inflammation epithelium loses keratinized surface and may thicken, may develop rete process or ulceration may occur. The major histopathological features that can be considered to predict recurrences in OKC are higher level of cell proliferative activity in the epithelium, budding in the basal layer of the epithelium, parakeratinization of the surface layer, supraepithelial split of the epithelial lining, subepithelial split of the epithelial lining, presence of remnants/cell rests as well as daughter cysts. 20

Discussion

Odontogenic keratocyst (OKC) is of particular interest because of its high recurrence rate and aggressive behavior. The age at diagnosis and sex distributions of patients with OKCs have been reported. As in other studies. OKC was found to occur in patients of a wide age range, with an average patient age of 30.8 years. 21, 22, 23, 24

The ratio of men to women with OKC was believed to be 1:1 in both genders. Although several other studies have reported a male predilection for OKC. 25, 26, 27 The most common clinical manifestations shown were swelling, pain, or both, which is in according with other studies.7, 28, 29 OKCs were sometimes symptom-free and were found incidentally during routine radiographic examination 9, 25, which was consistent with the information from previous studies that the OKCs tend to enlarge in cancellous bone to a considerable size before any significant buccal or lingual expansion appears to alert the clinicians and patients of an underlying lesion.23, 26, 27 KOT is locally destructive, has a high recurrence rate, and may be associated with increased morbidity secondary to multiple surgical procedures.22, 30

Keratocysts can be located at the periapical region giving the differential diagnosis of periapical cysts; or they may envelope the crowns of unerupted teeth, mimicking dentigerous cysts.31, 32, 33 It has been postulated that several mechanisms are involved in the recurrence of OKCs, including incomplete removal of the cyst walls or the epithelial islands and/or microcysts, development of a new cyst as in BCNS, parakeratocysts, and surgical access difficulty (Stoelinga, 2005; Giuliani et al., 2006; Chirapathomsakul et al., 2006; Tolstunov and Treasure, 2008).29, 34, 35

The treatment of the KCOT remains controversial. The choice of treatment should be based on multiple factors; patient age, size and location of the cyst, soft tissue involvement, history of previous treatment and a histological variant of the lesion. The goal is to choose the treatment modality that carries the lowest risk of recurrence and the least morbidity. Treatments are generally classified as conservative or aggressive. Conservative treatment generally includes simple enucleation, with or without curettage, or marsupialization. Aggressive treatment generally includes peripheral ostectomy, chemical curettage with Carnoy’s solution, BIPP, cryotherapy, or electrocautery and resection. 36

Decompression and marsupialization of cysts is probably the earliest recommended treatment and was first suggested by Partsch in the late 19th century. In many parts of the world,marsupialization is still described as a Partsch I procedure (the Partsch II procedure is enucleation and primary closure) 37

To enucleate is ‘‘to remove whole or clean, as a tumour from its envelope.’’ Curettage is defined as ‘‘the removal of growths or other material from the wall of a cavity Enucleation with and without various adjuncts has been utilized for many years. Although enucleation/curettage hasthe advantage over marsupialization of providing a complete specimen for histopathologic analysis, it shows recurrence rates as high as 62.5%, which is no longer an acceptable treatment modality. This high incidence of recurrence is explained by the thin, friable wall of the OKCT, which is often difficult to enucleate from the bone in one piece, and the small satellite cysts within fibrous wall.8,9 Many clinicians consider enucleation and curettage as the minimal requirement in the treatment of KCOT. 38 OKCs treated with enucleation had a significantly higher recurrence rate than those treated with other methods. 7, 39, 40, 41

It is suggested that if enucleation is chosen as a surgical treatment, the clinician should give more attention on the dentate area and remove the teeth if there is any doubt of leaving pathologic tissue behind. 42, 43 Some clinical and molecular studies showed that the parakeratinized and orthokeratinized OKCs were significantly different in molecular area as well as the Recurrence rate; orthokeratinized OKCs had a lower recurrence rate than the parakeratinized OKCs, with which the relevance of the histology is not clear with respect to the behavior of both entities. 36, 43

As a result of the difficulty of enucleating the thin, friable wall of the KCOT as one piece, and due to the small satellite cysts, therefore, treatment should aim to eliminate the possible vital cells left behind in the defect. For this reason, a mild, not deeply penetrating, cauterizing agent is used such as Carnoy’s solution {consists 3 ml of chloroform, 6 ml of absolute ethanol, 1 ml of glacial acetic acid and 1 g of ferric Chloride}. 5 This should be enough to do cauterization of the remaining cells. In case the cyst has penetrated through the lingual or buccal cortex, authors described the use electrocauterization to avoid a recurrence in the soft tissues. 44

The exact location of epithelial islands and microcysts remains a controversy. They may be located in the connective tissue cyst wall, in the overlying soft tissue and/or in the bony bed of the cyst. The use of liquid nitrogen, Carnoy’s solution and peripheral ostectomy is to eliminate epithelial islands and microcysts in the peripheral bone. These adjuncts, when used along with enucleation, considerably decrease the recurrence rate. 1

BIPP can be used as well. BIPP is a bright yellow paste of sub nitrate 250mg/g, iodoform 500mg/g and liquid paraffin 250 mg/g. It is usually indicated to pack cavaties after ear, nose and throat surgery. This paste is usually placed in cavities and left in place till the cavities heals or a graft is taken. It is not recommended to be used for open wounds.

Bismuth has topical antiseptic properties and can be used as an astringent and contributing to the antibacterial properties of BIPP by releasing dilute nitric acid on hydrolysis. Bismuth has a half-life of 5 days in the body but is known to remain in kidney for a longer duration. Bismuth has side effects like neurotoxicity because it is known to interfere with oxidative metabolism of brain. Symptoms of its toxicity include Head ache, Nausea, Stomatitis, Bismuth line in the gingiva (Bismuth line). 32

Iodoform chemical name is triodomethane. This is another component of BIPP. It has a distinctive colour as well as smell. Iodoform decomposes to release iodine which is an antiseptic. Paraffin is added into BIPP as a lubricant which aids in atraumatic placement and removal of pack. 32

Theoretically, the ideal treatment for the KCOT would be enucleation or curettage followed by treatment of the cavity with an agent that would kill the epithelial remnants or satellite cysts. In addition, the osseous framework should be left intact to allow for osteoconduction. Liquid nitrogen has the ability to devitalize bone in situ while leaving the inorganic framework untouched, as a result of this, cryotherapy has been used for a number of locally aggressive jaw lesions, including KCOT, ameloblastoma and ossifying fibroma. 45 Cell death with cryosurgery occurs by direct damage from intracellular and extracellular ice crystal formation plus osmotic and electrolyte disturbances. 46

Lastly leaving the option of Resection where it refers to either segmental resection (surgical removal of a segment of the mandible or maxilla without maintaining the continuity of the bone) or marginal resection (surgical removal of a lesion intact, with a rim of uninvolved bone, maintaining the continuity of the bone) which is an extreme technique, that results in considerable morbidity, particularly because reconstructive measures are necessary to restore jaw function and aesthetics. 47

Conclusion

Although the literature contains many reports regarding management of KCOT, debate still exists as to the most effective treatment for this lesion.

Initial evaluation must include a thorough history and physical examination of the patient along with radiographic investigations, in order to formulate a probable differential diagnosis. Depending on size, location, and behavior, the treatment can be decided, be it an incisional versus excisional biopsy. Treatment of the KCOT varies from enucleation and curettage to osseous resection. Many factors should be considered in the selection of the appropriate treatment that includes size and extent, location, presence of perforation or soft tissue involvement, age of individual, primary or recurrent nature of lesion. Long-term follow-up is suggested because KCOTs have been known to have late recurrences. Our article attempts to give a gist of the features as well as treatment modalities of the KCOT. It also emphasizes the importance of a careful histological examination and the necessity of obtaining biopsy materials from various areas to prevent a misdiagnosis of large sized lesions. In the light of literature, it may be concluded that an aggressive treatment modality like marsupialization, enucleation with or without application of carnoy’s solution might be considered as a viable treatment modality for the KCOT.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

Source of Funding

None.

References

1 

O Ribeiro Junior A M Borba C A F Alves M M de Gouveia F L Coracin J Guimarães Júnior Keratocystic odontogenic tumors and Carnoy's solution: results and complications assessmentOral Dis20121865485710.1111/j.1601-0825.2012.01907.x

2 

C C Gomes M G Diniz R S Gomez Review of the molecular pathogenesis of the odontogenic keratocystOral Oncol2009451210114

3 

J Madras H Lapointe Keratocystic odontogenic tumour: reclassification of the odontogenic keratocyst from cyst to tumourJ Can Dent Assoc2008742165

4 

T J Li The odontogenic keratocyst: a cyst, or a cystic neoplasm?J Dent Res20119021334210.1177/0022034510379016

5 

T A Morgan C C Burton F Qian A retrospective review of treatment of the odontogenic keratocystJ Oral Maxillofac Surg2005635635910.1016/j.joms.2004.07.026

6 

M Singh K C Gupta Surgical treatment of odontogenic keratocyst by enucleationContemp Clin Dent201014263710.4103/0976-237X.76398

7 

D Chirapathomsakul P Sastravaha P Jansisyanont A review of odontogenic keratocysts and the behavior of recurrencesOral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod200610115910.1016/j.tripleo.2005.03.023

8 

B W Bouquot D D Damm C M Allen Jerry E Oral and maxillofacial pathology1Philadelphia: WB Saunders20023912

9 

R B Brannon The odontogenic keratocyst: A clinicopathologic study of 312 cases. Part I. Clinical features. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol .1976421547210.1016/0030-4220(76)90031-1

10 

N Brøndum V J Jensen Recurrence of keratocysts and decompression treatment: a long-term follow-up of forty-four casesOral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol1991723265910.1016/0030-4220(91)90211-t

11 

Z Kolár M Geierová J Bouchal J Pazdera V Zboril P Tyrdy´ Immunohistochemical analysis of the biological potential of odontogenic keratocystsJ Oral Pathol Med2006352758010.1111/j.1600-0714.2006.00382.x

12 

P E Souza R A Mesquita R S Gomez Evaluation of p53, PCNA, Ki-67, MDM-2 and AgNOR in oral peripheral and central giant cell lesionsOral Dis20006135910.1111/j.1601-0825.2000.tb00319.x

13 

I Kaplan Y Anavi R Manor J Sulkes S Calderon The use of molecular markers as an aid in the diagnosis of glandular odontogenic cystOral Oncol200541989590210.1016/j.oraloncology.2005.04.015

14 

N P Agaram B Collins L Barnes D Lomago D Aldeeb P Swalsky Molecular analysis to demonstrate that odontogenic keratocyst are neoplasticArch Pathol Lab Med20041283313710.5858/2004-128-313-MATDTO

15 

F Meiselman Surgical management of the odontogenic keratocyst: conservative approachJ Oral Maxillofac Surg1994529960310.1016/s0278-2391(10)80080-1

16 

B P Nayak Kumar A review of odontogenic keratocyst with a report of unusual occurrence in the maxillaIndian J Dent Res2002133-41836

17 

Cysts of the Jaws and Neck Oral Pathology (Sixth Edition) Clinical Pathologic Correlations201224669

18 

R P B Dawber T J Ryan Basal cell nevus syndrome and malignant meningiomaBr J Dermatol19801031842

19 

R C Jordan Histology and ultrastructural features of the odontogenic keratocyst Oral and Maxillofacial Surg Clin200315332533

20 

R B Brannon The odontogenic keratocyst A clinicopathologic study of 312 cases. Part I. Clinical featuresOral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol1976421547210.1016/0030-4220(76)90031-1

21 

H Myoung S P Hong S D Hong J I Lee C Y Lim P H Choung J H Lee J Y Choi B M Seo M J Kim Odontogenic keratocyst: review of 256 cases for recurrence and clinicopathologic parametersOral Surg, Oral Med, Oral Pathol, Oral Radiol Endodontol200191332833

22 

J E Dashow J B Mchugh T M Braun S P Edwards J I Helman B B Ward Significantly decreased recurrence rates in keratocystic odontogenic tumor with simple enucleation and curettage using Carnoy's versus modified Carnoy's solutionJ Oral Maxillofac Surg2015731121325

23 

T F Payne An analysis of the clinical and histologic parameters Of OKCOral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol19723345364610.1016/0030-4220(72)90366-0

24 

R M Browne The odontogenic keratocysts: clinical aspectsBr Dent J197012852253110.1038/sj.bdj.4802449

25 

D A Keith Macroscopic satellite cyst formation in the odontoGenic keratocystOral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol197335121710.1016/0030-4220(73)90089-3

26 

P J Stoelinga Long term follow up on keratocysts treated According to a defined protocolInt J Oral Maxillofac Surg2001301142510.1054/ijom.2000.0027

27 

N Zachariades S Papanicolaou D Triantafyllou Odontogenic keratocysts: review of the literature and report of sixteen casesJ Oral Maxillofac Surg19854331778210.1016/0278-2391(85)90156-9

28 

E Kakarantza-Angelopoulou O Nicolatou Odontogenic kerato-Cysts: clinicopathologic study of 87 casesJ Oral Maxillofac Surg199048659360210.1016/s0278-2391(10)80472-0

29 

B C Magnusson Odontogenic keratocysts: a clinical and histoLogical study with special reference to enzyme histochemistryJ Oral Pathol19787181810.1111/j.1600-0714.1978.tb01880.x

30 

R B Donoff E Harper W C Guralnick Collagenolytic activity in keratocystsJ Oral Surg1972301287984

31 

M Shear The aggressive nature of the odontogenic keratocyst: is it a benign cystic neoplasm? Part 1. Clinical and early experimental evidence of aggressive behaviourOral Oncol20023843233110.1016/S1368-8375(01)00066-5

32 

R Agrawal A Sangle A Vyawahare Bismuth Iodoform and paraffin paste a boon in treatment of keratocystic odontogenic tumor: a case reportJ Dent Med Res20141325

33 

T D Daley G P Wysocki G A Pringle Relative incidence of odontogenic tumors and oral and jaw cysts in a Canadian populationOral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol19947732768010.1016/0030-4220(94)90299-2

34 

J F Kreidler E J Raubenheimer W F Van Heerden A retrospective analysis of 367 cystic lesions of the jaw—the Ulm experienceJ Cranio-Maxillofacial Surg199321833941

35 

M A Cohen Histological comparison of parakeratinized and orthokeratinized primordial cysts (keratocysts)J Dent Assoc S Afr19803531615

36 

C H Siar K H Ng Orthokeratinised odontogenic keratocysts in MalaysiansBr J Oral Maxillofac Surg198826321520

37 

A S High P A Robinson C E Klein Discrimination of parakeratinised odontogenic keratocysts from other odontogenic and non-odontogenic cyst types by expression of a 38kd cell-surface glycoproteinJ Oral Pathol Med1993228363710.1111/j.1600-0714.1993.tb01090.x

38 

T J Li M Kitano X M Chen T Itoh K Kawashima K Sugihara Orthokeratinized odontogenic cyst: a clinicopathological and immunocytochemical study of 15 casesHistopathology199832324251

39 

Y Maeda J Hirota K Yoneda T Osaki Immunohistochemical study of jaw cysts: different existence of keratins in odontogenic and non-odontogenic epithelial liningsJ Oral Pathol Med19901972899410.1111/j.1600-0714.1990.tb00846.x

40 

R Chuong R B Donoff W Guralnick The odontogenic keratocystJ Oral Maxillofac Surg1982401279780210.1016/0278-2391(82)90177-x

41 

M Partridge J F Towers The primordial cyst (odontogenic keratocyst): its tumour-like characteristics and behaviourBr J Oral Maxillofac Surg19872542719

42 

G El-Hajj G Anneroth Odontogenic keratocysts-a retrospective clinical and histologic study Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg19962521249

43 

G Persson Remarkable recurrenceof a keratocyst in a bone-graft Int J Oral Surg1973226976

44 

M J Da Silva S O De Sousa L Corrêa A A Carvalhosa V C De Araâaujo Immunohistochemical study of the orthokeratinized odontogenic cyst: a comparison with the odontogenic keratocyst.Oral Surg, Oral Med, Oral Pathol, Oral Radiol, Endodontol2002946732710.1067/moe.2002.125199

45 

P E Maurette J Jorge M De Moraes Conservative treatment protocol of odontogenic keratocyst: a preliminary studyJ Oral Maxillofac Surg200664337983

46 

M Giuliani G B Grossi C Lajolo M Bisceglia K E Herb Conservative management of a large odontogenic keratocyst: report of a case and review of the literatureJ Oral Maxillofac Surg200664230816

47 

A Kolokythas R P Fernandes A Pazoki R A Ord Odontogenic keratocyst: to decompress or not to decompress? A comparative study of decompression and enucleation versus resection/peripheral ostectomy J Oral Maxillofac Surg20076546404



jats-html.xsl


This is an Open Access (OA) journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

  • Article highlights
  • Article tables
  • Article images

Article History

Received : 20-11-2021

Accepted : 25-12-2021


View Article

PDF File   Full Text Article


Copyright permission

Get article permission for commercial use

Downlaod

PDF File   XML File   ePub File


Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

Article DOI

https://doi.org/ 10.18231/j.idjsr.2021.032


Article Metrics






Article Access statistics

Viewed: 1961

PDF Downloaded: 774